|
The Urban Wildlands
Group
and
February 23-24, 2002
Los Angeles, California
Catherine Rich & Travis Longcore
Conference Co-Chairs
Abstracts
Plant photoreceptors: proteins that perceive
information vital for plant development from the light environment
Winslow R. Briggs
Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington
260 Panama Street, Stanford, California 94305, USA
Tel: (650) 325-1521 x207, Fax: (650) 325-6857
As sessile organisms, higher plants rely heavily
on environmental signals to guide their development. Among the more
important environmental signals are those that come from their light
environment. Thus in the course of evolution plants have acquired a
wide range of photoreceptors that perceive and respond to light signals
in the ultraviolet, blue, red, and near-infrared regions of the electromagnetic
spectrum. In the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, nine different
photoreceptors have been characterized. Those absorbing and responding
to UV-A and blue wavelengths of light include two cryptochromes, cry1
and cry2, and two phototropins, phot1 and phot2. Those absorbing in
the red and far-red regions of the spectrum are the five phytochromes.
There is also evidence for photoreceptors that sense and respond to
UV-B, although these remain to be characterized. These many photoreceptors
allow the plant to measure and respond to four parameters of the light
environment: light spectral quality, light intensity, light direction,
and light duration. Sometimes these photoreceptors act independently,
sometimes redundantly, sometimes cooperatively, sometimes antagonistically,
sometimes at the same stage of development, and sometimes at different
stages of development. Some of the responses are incredibly sensitive,
responding to levels of light that even the human eye can barely perceive.
Among the many processes affected by light are seed germination, stem
elongation, leaf expansion, conversion from a vegetative state to a
flowering state, flower development, fruit development, and senescence.
There is virtually no rigorous research on the influence of urban lighting
on plants. There are anecdotal reports of leaves of deciduous trees
failing to senesce in proximity to streetlights because they perceive
a long day instead of a short one, but little else. While it is highly
likely that urban light does affect plant development, research is badly
needed to assess what the effects might be.
Measuring light pollution in urban lakes and
its effects on lake invertebrates
Marianne V. Moore and Susan J. Kohler
Department of Biological Sciences and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Center, Wellesley College
106 Central Street, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481-8203, USA
Tel: (781) 283-3098, Fax: (781) 283-3642
Lakes or coastal waters in or near cities may
experience high levels of artificial light at night, because they are
generally not shaded by trees or buildings. Predicting ecological effects
of this light on submerged organisms requires estimating the amount
of artificial light at the water's surface and the depth of its penetration.
This has never been done, in part, because no light meters are available
commercially for quantifying such low light intensities either at the
surface of aquatic habitats or underwater. We obtained two independent
measures of the intensity of artificial lighting at the surface of five
lakes by using two different instruments: 1) a custom-built light meter
containing a photomultiplier tube, and 2) a modified diode-array spectrometer.
The lakes ranged in location from inner city Boston, Massachusetts to
within the White Mountains National Forest, New Hampshire. We also measured
the spectral distribution of the artificial light, and we estimated
its depth of penetration underwater. Spectra of the artificial light
striking all urban and suburban lakes were nearly identical, and were
dominated by light in the yellow region with a peak centered at approximately
590 nm and a width at halfheight of approximately 55 nm. These spectra
closely matched the emission spectrum of high-pressure sodium lamps,
the most common street lamp in the USA. Incident levels of artificial
light at an urban lake (on the order of 10-3 µE m-2 s-1) were
similar to the light intensity emitted from a full moon and nearly 50
times greater than that of a rural lake illuminated by starlight only.
On average, suburban lakes experienced artificial light intensities
5-30 times greater than that of the rural lake. Cloud cover increased
incident levels of artificial light two- to threefold. The depth to
which this artificial light is biologically detectable underwater by
crustacean grazers and fish was estimated to be approximately 3 meters
using vertical extinction coefficients determined for the lakes in conjunction
with published limits of light detection by aquatic organisms. Potential
effects of this light on submerged aquatic organisms and results from
field experiments in which artificial light was manipulated will be
discussed.
Artificial night lighting and insects in Germany
Gerhard Eisenbeis
Department of Biology - Institute of Zoology, Soil Biology and
Soil Ecology Group
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
Tel: +(49) 6131-39-22574, Fax: +(49) 6131-39-23835
Nocturnal insects are extremely sensitive to
outdoor lighting because they have evolved special adaptations of photoreception.
They are often attracted to perform endless turns in the light sphere
of lamps, but there are other exogenous and endogenous factors that
control their behavior. The death struggle of insects around light sources
can be described by special effects, e.g. "captivation effect,"
"crash-barrier effect," or "vacuum cleaner effect."
In many cases insects become disoriented by these effects and are no
longer able to perform their basic functions of nutrition and reproduction.
Some results from a study within a rural landscape of Germany will be
presented, showing the impact of different street lamp types on insects
during a full summer season. These differences were quantified as capture
ratios regarding both the bulk of insect orders or special orders alone.
Besides light quality, the habitat characteristics were revealed to
be important in this context as well. Additionally, the influence of
full and new moon, and of the evening temperature, on the nocturnal
activity of insects will be shown. These facts suggest that outdoor
lighting may be a serious threat to insects. Based on results from literature
an attempt is made to calculate the dimension of insect mortality resulting
from a street lamp pool of a larger city up to the whole area level
of Germany. Thereafter some examples of how species and populations
with different life strategies may be influenced by lighting are considered.
Finally, examples of energy savings from converting older street lamp
systems into modern systems will be shown, especially the change away
from high-pressure mercury lamps, which may reduce energy costs and
CO2 emissions significantly. The modernization of public lighting is
beneficial both for township budgets and for the agenda of nature conservation,
especially of insects.
Impact of artificial lighting on moths
Kenneth D. Frank
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Artificial lighting has been blamed for decreases in populations of
moths. By disrupting moth navigation and suppressing flight, it interferes
with mating, dispersal, and migration. It also disturbs feeding, oviposition,
nocturnal vision and, possibly, circadian rhythms. It increases predation
by birds, bats, spiders, and other predators. It traps moths in buildings,
diverts moths into vehicular traffic, and burns or desiccates moths
that fly into lamp housings. Almost all of these effects are a consequence
of flight-to-light behavior. Most species of macrolepidoptera moths
exhibit such behavior, and most kinds of lamps used for artificial lighting
elicit it. However, many species of moths thrive near urban and suburban
lighting. Destruction of vast numbers of moths in light traps has failed
to eradicate moth populations. Extinctions due exclusively to artificial
lighting have not been documented. Nevertheless, artificial lighting
may weaken or eliminate small populations threatened by other disturbances,
particularly in habitats fragmented by urban development. It generates
selective pressure favoring evolutionary modification of flight-to-light
behavior. Because parasitoids of some moth species fly to light, artificial
lighting may disturb natural control of moth populations. Lighting should
be restricted where protection of biodiversity is a high priority, such
as in unusual ecological habitats, and in certain agricultural and horticultural
settings. To limit artificial lighting, light sources should be turned
off whenever illumination is not essential. Lamp housings should be
sealed tight, and located away from structures that may trap insects.
Low-pressure sodium lamps should be used in preference to other kinds
of lamps.
Stray light, fireflies, and fireflyers
James E. Lloyd
Department of Entomology & Nematology, University of Florida
Building 970, Natural Area Road, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
Tel: (352) 392-1901 x124
Fireflies (Lampyridae, Coleoptera) that use their
chemiluminescence for sexual communication have a number of attributes
that make them good as well as unique subjects when considering the
effects of artificial light in natural environments. First, fireflies
may be expected to have inappropriate "innate" responses to
foreign light similar to those that occur in other organisms, but because
of their conspicuous luminescent signals, some alterations may be more
easily monitored and quantified. Second, because much of firefly life
activity is mediated through their own pinpoints of light in otherwise
dimly lit or dark environments, firefly relationship to light is virtually
unique in the terrestrial world; thus, foreign light will have even
more serious consequences for them, and they provide a special case
for study. Fireflies may be useful as model systems for the study of
the long- and short-term consequences of ecological insults that occur
in combination. Third, because of their unique place in human culture,
fireflies can be used as subjects as well as icons when educating and
enlisting the help of the public, especially children and older students,
and for reminding them of the continuing attention that is required
to improve and then maintain healthy natural environments.
Observed and potential effects of artificial
light on the behavior, ecology, and evolution of nocturnal frogs
Bryant W. Buchanan
Department of Biology, Utica College of Syracuse University
1600 Burrstone Road, Utica, New York 13502, USA
Tel: (315) 792-3131, Fax: (315) 792-3831
Most frogs are thought to be largely or completely
nocturnal. About 3500 species of frogs inhabit a wide variety of fossorial,
terrestrial, aquatic, and arboreal habitats and possess a wide variety
of visual adaptations to these varied environments. Understanding frog
natural history, activity patterns, and visual capabilities can greatly
facilitate making predictions about the potential effects of light pollution
on a given species. Experiments and anecdotal evidence demonstrate that
both temporary and permanent changes to the illumination of an area
may affect frog reproduction, foraging, predator avoidance, and social
interactions. Laboratory experiments have demonstrated that dark-adapted
frogs exposed to rapid increases in illumination may be temporarily
"blinded" and unable to gather visual information on prey,
predators, or conspecifics until their eyes adapt to the new illumination.
Permanent increases in nocturnal illumination may facilitate or inhibit
a variety of behaviors. Foraging may be facilitated in frogs that hunt
around lights because the ambient illumination is increased to a level
that allows the frogs to see prey or because lights attract abnormally
large quantities of prey (e.g., insects). Reproductive activity may
be inhibited in species that normally reproduce only at very low illuminations.
Increased illumination may allow predators to see frogs that may not
normally be visible to them. Circadian rhythms, activity patterns, and
intraspecific visual communication may also be affected by increased
illumination. Much more field and laboratory research is necessary to
assess the full extent of direct and indirect effects of artificial
night lighting on the behavior, ecology, and evolution of frogs.
The influence of artificial illumination on
the nocturnal behavior and ecology of salamanders
Sharon Wise and Bryant W. Buchanan
Department of Biology, Utica College of Syracuse University
1600 Burrstone Road, Utica, New York 13502, USA
Tel: (315) 792-3356, Fax: (315) 792-3831
Little is known of the direct influence of artificial
illumination on the biology of nocturnal salamanders. However, several
studies provide evidence that artificial light may influence some aspects
of their behavior and ecology. In this talk, the role of vision and
the influence of light on the activity patterns, prey detection, predator
avoidance, agonistic behavior, and orientation of salamanders to breeding
ponds will be examined. Nocturnal foraging may be influenced by artificial
illumination. In one species, salamanders emerge from refugia to forage
within one hour after light levels drop dramatically following sunset.
During such foraging bouts, visual information is useful for locating
prey. Greater light levels may delay emergence (resulting in less foraging
time) but increase the ability of salamanders to capture prey. However,
such increases in light levels may also make salamanders more vulnerable
to predation. Some salamanders are territorial and aggressively defend
areas containing valuable resources. Increased illumination may alter
the outcome of territorial contests. Laboratory experiments demonstrate
that light levels affect behavioral interactions between conspecifics
such that salamanders exhibit more visual displays when more light is
available. Finally, many salamanders are terrestrial as adults but migrate
to ponds to breed and lay eggs. The orientation of some species away
from and toward these ponds is influenced by the spectral characteristics
of light. Artificial lights that emit unusual spectra may disrupt these
migration patterns. Because many salamanders are nocturnal and use visual
cues for so many different biological functions, further experimentation
on the influence of artificial illumination on the behavior and ecology
of salamanders is warranted.
Lighting problems at Florida's oceanic beaches:
lessons learned from sea turtles
Michael Salmon
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University
Box 3091, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, Florida 33431, USA
Tel: (561) 297-2747, Fax: (561) 297-2749
Florida's beaches are major rookeries for Western
Atlantic loggerhead sea turtles, and minor rookeries for an increasing
population of leatherback and green turtles. But coastal development
in Florida continues unabated, increasing beach exposure to nocturnal
illumination. As a consequence, the Florida coast has become a laboratory
for testing methods designed to protect the turtles (nesting females
and their hatchlings) from "photopollution." I first review
how under natural conditions at night, females choose nest sites and
hatchlings locate the sea from the nest. I then describe how both females
and hatchlings are adversely affected by exposure to artificial lighting.
I next critically evaluate two approaches to protecting hatchlings at
local sites: nest manipulation and lighting modification. The second
approach is more effective, though not always possible. Finally, I review
the design, philosophy, and implementation of broad-scale plans to restore
nesting beaches at the coastal community (Patrick Air Force Base), county
(Broward County), and state (coastal roadway) levels. I argue that broad-scale
planning best protects existing dark beaches, restores those currently
exposed to moderate levels of lighting, and controls the lighting environment
where new development is anticipated. The beneficiaries are sea turtles
and other nocturnally-active organisms, as well as humans residing in
coastal communities.
Artificial night-lighting effects on salmon
and other fishes in the Northwest
Barbara Nightingale and Charles Simenstad
University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences
324A Fishery Sciences, 1122 Boat Street, Box 35502, Seattle, WA 98195-5020,
USA
Teleost fish reaction to light stimulus depends
upon fish physiologic adaptation to ambient light levels prior to exposure
to light level changes. Laboratory studies examining the use of artificial
light to guide juvenile salmon through migration barriers report measurable
differences in fish responses to variations in the quantity and quality
of artificial light. Studies in the Pacific Northwest report potential
changes in fish migration behavior and the distribution of fishes in
night-lighted areas. Such changes potentially increase mortality risks
for salmon, herring, and sand lance. Juvenile chum and their predators,
such as hake, dogfish, sculpin, large chinook, and coho, appear to congregate
below night security lights with increased light intensities attracting
the chum and potentially delaying outmigration; however, predator stomach
analyses have not demonstrated heavy chum consumption in those conditions.
In contrast, night lighting has also been found to attract juvenile
herring and sand lance along with their predators, with heavy predation
occurring on the herring and sand lance populations. Predators have
also been known to take advantage of lighting at fish ladders, spillways,
and bridges to prey on migrating salmon. The present limited number
of in situ studies of artificial night lighting, coupled with
the spatial and temporal limitations of existing studies, warrants further
exploration to identify the extent of fish distribution changes over
time and the real harm posed to these fishes. The potential changes
in species abundance and dominance resulting from increased prey access
under artificial lighting also warrant further exploration.
The behavioral responses of migrating birds
to different lighting systems on tall towers
Sidney A. Gauthreaux, Jr. and Carroll G. Belser
Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University
Clemson, South Carolina 29634-0326, USA
Tel: (864) 656-3584
Hundreds of species of birds typically migrate
at night, and it is well known that fires and man-made lights attract
birds during migration, particularly when the sky is cloudy and the
ceiling is low. As early as 1886, E.A. Gastman reported that nearly
1,000 migratory birds were killed around electric light towers in Decatur,
Illinois on a single evening. Exactly 110 years later a report for World
Wildlife Fund Canada and the Fatal Light Awareness Program detailed
the hazards of lighted structures and windows to migrating birds. In
an effort to understand why birds are attracted to lights and to assess
the influences of different types of warning light arrays on towers,
we examined the behavior of nocturnal migrants flying near tall towers
with different types of lighting. During spring migration we monitored
flight behavior on 9 evenings near a strobe light FM radio tower and
over a control area. During fall migration we monitored flight behavior
on 14 evenings near a television tower with red lights, near a television
tower with white strobe lights, and over a control area that had no
tower. We used an image intensifier to monitor birds flying overhead,
and coded the flight behavior of migrants into the following categories:
linear flight (straight) and nonlinear flight (pause-hover, curved,
or circling). During the spring study, the numbers of birds showing
nonlinear flight near the tower with white strobe lights was significantly
greater than at the control site, but the number of birds recorded at
each site was not significantly different. During the fall study the
number of birds showing nonlinear flight near the tower with red lighting
was significantly greater than those flying near the tower with white
strobes. The number of birds showing nonlinear flight near the tower
with white strobes was significantly greater than those flying over
the control site. Significantly more birds were recorded flying near
the tower with red lights than flying near the tower with white strobes
and over the control site. The number of birds detected flying near
the tower with white strobes did not differ significantly from the number
recorded over the control site. The greater number of birds near the
tower with red lights is likely the result of "attraction"
to the constantly illuminated lights on towers with red light arrays
and the proportion of the time the birds showed nonlinear flight behavior.
While birds in linear flight spend only a brief instant near the tower
and leave the area, birds showing curved, circling, or hovering behavior
spend more time near the tower and thus build concentrations of migrants
in the area. Once concentrations build, the birds themselves may become
collision hazards to other birds.
Artificial lighting and the decline of seabirds
Richard Podolsky
Avian Systems
279 Melvin Heights Road, Camden, Maine 04843, USA
With only a very few exceptions seabirds as a
group are in decline worldwide. Invariably, human activity is the driving
force of this global decline. Artificial lighting is one of a suite
of human impacts that together are contributing to the downward trend
in distribution and abundance of the world's 300 species of seabirds.
Artificial lighting is believed to confuse seabirds while they are migrating
long and short distances, especially while they move between urbanized
nesting sites to their feeding grounds at sea. Many seabirds are nocturnal
and move between land and sea at dusk or at night and as such are particularly
vulnerable to artificial lighting. Once they are disoriented they are
at risk of colliding with artificial structures such as buildings and
transmission towers or of falling onto roadways and being run over by
vehicles. One of the more dramatic examples of this is on the island
of Kauai where Newell's Shearwater (Puffinus auricularis newellii)
and Hawaiian Petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia sandwichensis) are
estimated conservatively to have declined to a small fraction of their
pre-development levels. A community-wide salvage program called Save
Our Shearwaters (SOS) has done much over the last 30 years to ameliorate
this human-induced mortality as has a program to install shielded lighting
around the island. However, these efforts do not appear to provide a
sufficient offset to the mortality to ensure the survival of these two
endemic Hawaiian seabirds.
Road illumination and black-tailed godwit
Johannes G. de Molenaar, Dick A. Jonkers and Marlies E. Sanders
Alterra, research institute for the green environment
P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Tel: +(31) 317-47-77-31, Fax: +(31) 317-41-90-00
Black-tailed godwit (Limosa l. limosa)
is an indicator species for the birdlife of open grassland in The Netherlands.
The influence of road lights on the breeding population of this bird
was studied in an area adjacent to a busy motorway. We compared one
year, when the road lights were switched off, with the next year, when
the lights were switched on. In a nearby second area, out of reach of
influence of the traffic on the motorway, there were no lights in the
first year. Early the next year 24 lights were installed. These were
identical to the lights along the motorway and switched on and off simultaneously
with them. All grassland parcels were individually characterized to
eliminate field conditions that may influence the birds' nest choice.
We then established the position of the nests, their distance to the
motorway and to the temporary illumination, the measures of the eggs,
and the date of laying of the first egg. The results reveal that road
illumination has a statistically significant negative influence on the
breeding habitat quality, reaching over several hundreds of meters.
It is likely that the effect is suppressed by the nest fidelity of the
birds, suggesting that the ultimate effect distance will be considerably
larger. Moreover, birds that breed early seemed to choose their nest
further away from the lights than birds that start later. A negative
influence of the motorway (traffic noise) seemed to be absent. Apparently
it can be compensated by favorable site factors. That the negative influence
of illumination is not compensated suggests that this is stronger than
the influence of the road.
Turning night into day: the effects of artificial
night lighting on endangered and other mammal species
Melissa M. Grigione
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of
South Florida
4202 E. Fowler Avenue, SCA 238, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA
Tel: (813) 974-7459, Fax: (813) 974-2184
This presentation will review the major studies
designed to measure the effects of artificial lighting on mammals in
the field and laboratory. The consequences of artificial lighting include
general disruptions in daily activity cycles, and reductions in dispersal,
foraging, and reproductive opportunities. Secondary effects on prey
species, offspring rearing, and habitat reductions as a result of flooding
habitat with lights are largely unexplored. In general, the research
effort in this area needs to be further developed and pursued. As habitat
continues to be fragmented by roads and other developments, the effects
of artificial lighting will be exacerbated. Many species could potentially
receive additional protection from habitat alterations, such as lights,
if a substantial literature base existed. To demonstrate this point,
a case study involving the protection of endangered ocelots in Texas
from large floodlights installed at the US-Mexico border will be reviewed.
This case study will demonstrate how difficult it is politically to
protect a species from artificial lights in the absence of either a
significant body of research about the effects of lights on mammals
or a detailed study on the specific effects of lights on ocelots. Lastly,
we will make recommendations about future studies that need to be undertaken
in order to clearly demonstrate the effects of turning night into day
for mammal species.
|